The Inner Room: Editorial (ACD Journal vol. 4) - Revision history

TCDE-Team at 23:04, 15 March 2026

2026-03-15T23:04:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:04, 16 March 2026
Line 11:		Line 11:
	1993 has been an interesting and successful year from the viewpoint of [[The Arthur Conan Doyle Society (1989-2003)\|The Arthur Conan Doyle Society]]. In March, we held our first Convention in Edinburgh, and that was a great success. September saw the publication of ''The Oxford Sherlock Holmes'', all four editors of which had connections with the Society. And in October we were heavily involved in the [[Sherlock Holmes]] postage stamps issue, offering two special first day covers with our own postal franking. In addition, the response from members during the year has only fired our enthusiasm and served to confirm our belief that the Society is on the right track.		1993 has been an interesting and successful year from the viewpoint of [[The Arthur Conan Doyle Society (1989-2003)\|The Arthur Conan Doyle Society]]. In March, we held our first Convention in Edinburgh, and that was a great success. September saw the publication of ''The Oxford Sherlock Holmes'', all four editors of which had connections with the Society. And in October we were heavily involved in the [[Sherlock Holmes]] postage stamps issue, offering two special first day covers with our own postal franking. In addition, the response from members during the year has only fired our enthusiasm and served to confirm our belief that the Society is on the right track.

	There is always a temptation to look back to see what was happening in [[Arthur Conan Doyle\|ACD]]'s life one hundred years ago. For him, 1893 was a year of mixed fortunes. He had three books published: [[The Refugees]], the combined book edition of [[The Great Shadow]] and [[Beyond the City]] and [[The Memoirs of Sherlock Holmes]]. '[[The Green Flag]]' appeared in [[Pall Mall Magazine]] in June, The Slapping Sal' in The Vagabond's Annual in August, and '[[The Case of Lady Sannox]]' in Idler in November. Jane Annie, the musical-comedy co-written with [[J. M. Barrie]], failed in October. October also saw the death of [[Arthur Conan Doyle\|ACD]]'s father [[Charles Altamont Doyle]]. And the December issue of [[The Strand Magazine]] saw [[Arthur Conan Doyle\|ACD]] killing off [[Sherlock Holmes]].		There is always a temptation to look back to see what was happening in [[Arthur Conan Doyle\|ACD]]'s life one hundred years ago. For him, 1893 was a year of mixed fortunes. He had three books published: [[The Refugees]], the combined book edition of [[The Great Shadow]] and [[Beyond the City]] and [[The Memoirs of Sherlock Holmes]]. '[[The Green Flag]]' appeared in [[The Pall Mall Magazine\|Pall Mall Magazine]] in June, '[[The Slapping Sal]]' in ''The Vagabond's Annual'' in August, and '[[The Case of Lady Sannox]]' in Idler in November. [[Jane Annie; or, The Good Conduct Prize\|Jane Annie]], the musical-comedy co-written with [[J. M. Barrie]], failed in October. October also saw the death of [[Arthur Conan Doyle\|ACD]]'s father [[Charles Altamont Doyle]]. And the December issue of [[The Strand Magazine]] saw [[Arthur Conan Doyle\|ACD]] killing off [[Sherlock Holmes]].

	[[Sherlock Holmes]], of course, has a tendency to overshadow everything else that [[Arthur Conan Doyle\|ACD]] wrote or did during his lifetime. Partly this is because [[Sherlock Holmes\|Holmes]] is such an enduring character; but it is also because, through the various Sherlockian societies, such a large following has developed, and so much has been written about [[Sherlock Holmes]], that there is a tendency to overlook the fact that [[Sherlock Holmes\|Holmes]] is a fictional character created by [[Arthur Conan Doyle]]. Mischievously, but damagingly, it was once suggested that [[Arthur Conan Doyle\|ACD]] merely acted as the Literary Agent for Dr John H. Watson, who actually wrote the stories. From that small acorn has a huge oak tree grown: a tree of learned papers and detailed chronologies. It is those chronologies which help to highlight the chief difference between Sherlockians (or Holmesians as the followers of [[Sherlock Holmes]] in Britain prefer to be known) and Doyleans. 1893 was the year in which [[Sherlock Holmes]] 'disappeared', although [[Arthur Conan Doyle\|ACD]] set the events of his fictitious disappearance in 1891. 1994 will see Sherlockians celebrating [[Sherlock Holmes\|Holmes]]'s return from his 'great hiatus', an event which, in reality, was not reported until The Adventure of the Empty House' appeared in The Strand Magazine in October 1903. Does it really matter? No, it does not really matter. Sherlockians will gain much enjoyment looking at things in their own way. Similarly, Doyleans will gain similar enjoyment from the knowledge that [[Arthur Conan Doyle\|ACD]] wrote a superlative collection of stories when he created the [[Sherlock Holmes\|Holmes]] canon. Doyleans will also realise, however, that he wrote much more besides, much of it of an equal standard to the [[Sherlock Holmes\|Holmes]] stories. What really matters is that [[Arthur Conan Doyle\|ACD]] is given the credit for [[Sherlock Holmes\|Holmes]]: that his creative genius is recognised, and that he is no longer done the dis-service of being fobbed off as the mere 'Literary Agent'.		[[Sherlock Holmes]], of course, has a tendency to overshadow everything else that [[Arthur Conan Doyle\|ACD]] wrote or did during his lifetime. Partly this is because [[Sherlock Holmes\|Holmes]] is such an enduring character; but it is also because, through the various Sherlockian societies, such a large following has developed, and so much has been written about [[Sherlock Holmes]], that there is a tendency to overlook the fact that [[Sherlock Holmes\|Holmes]] is a fictional character created by [[Arthur Conan Doyle]]. Mischievously, but damagingly, it was once suggested that [[Arthur Conan Doyle\|ACD]] merely acted as the Literary Agent for Dr John H. Watson, who actually wrote the stories. From that small acorn has a huge oak tree grown: a tree of learned papers and detailed chronologies. It is those chronologies which help to highlight the chief difference between Sherlockians (or Holmesians as the followers of [[Sherlock Holmes]] in Britain prefer to be known) and Doyleans. 1893 was the year in which [[Sherlock Holmes]] 'disappeared', although [[Arthur Conan Doyle\|ACD]] set the events of his fictitious disappearance in 1891. 1994 will see Sherlockians celebrating [[Sherlock Holmes\|Holmes]]'s return from his 'great hiatus', an event which, in reality, was not reported until The Adventure of the Empty House' appeared in The Strand Magazine in October 1903. Does it really matter? No, it does not really matter. Sherlockians will gain much enjoyment looking at things in their own way. Similarly, Doyleans will gain similar enjoyment from the knowledge that [[Arthur Conan Doyle\|ACD]] wrote a superlative collection of stories when he created the [[Sherlock Holmes\|Holmes]] canon. Doyleans will also realise, however, that he wrote much more besides, much of it of an equal standard to the [[Sherlock Holmes\|Holmes]] stories. What really matters is that [[Arthur Conan Doyle\|ACD]] is given the credit for [[Sherlock Holmes\|Holmes]]: that his creative genius is recognised, and that he is no longer done the dis-service of being fobbed off as the mere 'Literary Agent'.

TCDE-Team: Created page with " ''The Inner Room: Editorial [Vol. 4]'' is an article written by Christopher Roden published in the A.C.D. - The Journal of The Arthur Conan Doyle Society (Vol. 4, 1993). This editorial reflects on the Arthur Conan Doyle Society's successes in 1993 while arguing that Conan Doyle must be recognized as a major author in his own right, not reduced to Sherlock Holmes's "literary agent." It als..."

2026-03-15T23:02:03Z

Created page with " ''The Inner Room: Editorial [Vol. 4]'' is an article written by Christopher Roden published in the A.C.D. - The Journal of The Arthur Conan Doyle Society (Vol. 4, 1993). This editorial reflects on the Arthur Conan Doyle Society's successes in 1993 while arguing that Conan Doyle must be recognized as a major author in his own right, not reduced to Sherlock Holmes's "literary agent." It als..."

New page

''The Inner Room: Editorial [Vol. 4]'' is an article written by [[Christopher Roden]] published in the [[A.C.D. - The Journal of The Arthur Conan Doyle Society]] (Vol. 4, 1993).

This editorial reflects on the [[The Arthur Conan Doyle Society (1989-2003)|Arthur Conan Doyle Society]]'s successes in 1993 while arguing that [[Arthur Conan Doyle|Conan Doyle]] must be recognized as a major author in his own right, not reduced to [[Sherlock Holmes]]'s "literary agent." It also introduces the journal's contents and urges both Doyleans and Sherlockians to value the wider range of [[Arthur Conan Doyle|Conan Doyle]]'s writings beyond the [[Sherlock Holmes|Holmes]] stories.

== Editorial ==
[[File:Acd-society-journal-1993-vol4-p3-the-inner-room.jpg|thumb|250px|right|[[A.C.D. - The Journal of The Arthur Conan Doyle Society]] (Vol. 4, 1993, p. 3)]]
[[File:Acd-society-journal-1993-vol4-p4-the-inner-room.jpg|thumb|250px|right|[[A.C.D. - The Journal of The Arthur Conan Doyle Society]] (Vol. 4, 1993, p. 4)]]

1993 has been an interesting and successful year from the viewpoint of [[The Arthur Conan Doyle Society (1989-2003)|The Arthur Conan Doyle Society]]. In March, we held our first Convention in Edinburgh, and that was a great success. September saw the publication of ''The Oxford Sherlock Holmes'', all four editors of which had connections with the Society. And in October we were heavily involved in the [[Sherlock Holmes]] postage stamps issue, offering two special first day covers with our own postal franking. In addition, the response from members during the year has only fired our enthusiasm and served to confirm our belief that the Society is on the right track.

There is always a temptation to look back to see what was happening in [[Arthur Conan Doyle|ACD]]'s life one hundred years ago. For him, 1893 was a year of mixed fortunes. He had three books published: [[The Refugees]], the combined book edition of [[The Great Shadow]] and [[Beyond the City]] and [[The Memoirs of Sherlock Holmes]]. '[[The Green Flag]]' appeared in [[Pall Mall Magazine]] in June, The Slapping Sal' in The Vagabond's Annual in August, and '[[The Case of Lady Sannox]]' in Idler in November. Jane Annie, the musical-comedy co-written with [[J. M. Barrie]], failed in October. October also saw the death of [[Arthur Conan Doyle|ACD]]'s father [[Charles Altamont Doyle]]. And the December issue of [[The Strand Magazine]] saw [[Arthur Conan Doyle|ACD]] killing off [[Sherlock Holmes]].

[[Sherlock Holmes]], of course, has a tendency to overshadow everything else that [[Arthur Conan Doyle|ACD]] wrote or did during his lifetime. Partly this is because [[Sherlock Holmes|Holmes]] is such an enduring character; but it is also because, through the various Sherlockian societies, such a large following has developed, and so much has been written about [[Sherlock Holmes]], that there is a tendency to overlook the fact that [[Sherlock Holmes|Holmes]] is a fictional character created by [[Arthur Conan Doyle]]. Mischievously, but damagingly, it was once suggested that [[Arthur Conan Doyle|ACD]] merely acted as the Literary Agent for Dr John H. Watson, who actually wrote the stories. From that small acorn has a huge oak tree grown: a tree of learned papers and detailed chronologies. It is those chronologies which help to highlight the chief difference between Sherlockians (or Holmesians as the followers of [[Sherlock Holmes]] in Britain prefer to be known) and Doyleans. 1893 was the year in which [[Sherlock Holmes]] 'disappeared', although [[Arthur Conan Doyle|ACD]] set the events of his fictitious disappearance in 1891. 1994 will see Sherlockians celebrating [[Sherlock Holmes|Holmes]]'s return from his 'great hiatus', an event which, in reality, was not reported until The Adventure of the Empty House' appeared in The Strand Magazine in October 1903. Does it really matter? No, it does not really matter. Sherlockians will gain much enjoyment looking at things in their own way. Similarly, Doyleans will gain similar enjoyment from the knowledge that [[Arthur Conan Doyle|ACD]] wrote a superlative collection of stories when he created the [[Sherlock Holmes|Holmes]] canon. Doyleans will also realise, however, that he wrote much more besides, much of it of an equal standard to the [[Sherlock Holmes|Holmes]] stories. What really matters is that [[Arthur Conan Doyle|ACD]] is given the credit for [[Sherlock Holmes|Holmes]]: that his creative genius is recognised, and that he is no longer done the dis-service of being fobbed off as the mere 'Literary Agent'.

Such an ambition was behind ''The Oxford Sherlock Holmes'', a series which has, I believe, succeeded in establishing the [[Sherlock Holmes|Holmes]] canon as a fine body of English Literature, and [[Arthur Conan Doyle|Conan Doyle]] as the fine author that he was. So it is that our two groups become as one: Doyleans have much to give to Sherlockians, just as Sherlockians have much to contribute to our own studies. If there is a feeling that the two groups are opposed, it is misplaced. Doyleans certainly share the interest of Sherlockians; it is to be hoped that, in time, Sherlockians will come to recognise the wider world of [[Arthur Conan Doyle|ACD]]: many of them already do so.

Some of the events of 1893 will receive attention from speakers at the Toronto Convention in April 1994, but stories like '[[The Green Flag]]' and '[[The Case of Lady Sannox]]', about which little has been written, emphasise the vast treasure of literature which awaits the attentions of our membership. They also highlight the potential for future contributions. The Toronto Convention will be a fitting fifth birthday celebration for the Society, as also will be the unveiling of the plaque at Devonshire Place, which the Society is sponsoring. That plaque will make reference to '[[Arthur Conan Doyle]] - Author'. Any reference to [[Sherlock Holmes]] has been deliberately avoided, as it is my belief that now is the time for the world to recognise that [[Sherlock Holmes]] is not the be-all and end-all of [[Arthur Conan Doyle|Conan Doyle]]'s work. I sincerely hope that members will agree that the wording has been chosen correctly.

And so, to the contents of this Journal. In this issue we reprint a poem and a historical article by [[Arthur Conan Doyle|ACD]], both of which have only previously appeared in newspapers. We have articles looking at [[Arthur Conan Doyle|ACD]]'s ski-ing exploits, spiritualistic activities, visits to America and his associations with other great men of his time. There are also a couple of important Sherlockian items which prove, once again, how far ahead of the field [[Arthur Conan Doyle|Conan Doyle]]'s thinking really was. Most important of all, perhaps, this is the first time that we have been able to take a close look at the unpublished play Angels of Darkness. Michael Homer, in his winning entry in The David Kirby Memorial Essay Competition, and Cameron Hollyer take the opportunity to consider the play from widely differing viewpoints.

The future looks good. We are certainly encouraged by the growing interest in the Society and by awareness of [[Arthur Conan Doyle|ACD]] himself.

Christopher Roden

{{footer_acd_society_article}}
{{footer_periodicals}}