The Arthur Conan Doyle EncyclopediaThe Arthur Conan Doyle EncyclopediaThe Arthur Conan Doyle Encyclopedia
22 May 1859, Edinburgh M.D., Kt, D.L., LL.D., Sportsman, Writer, Poet, Politician, Justicer, Spiritualist Crowborough, 7 July 1930

Spirit Life and Personality

From The Arthur Conan Doyle Encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Spirit Life and Personality is a letter written by Arthur Conan Doyle first published in The Westminster Gazette on 16 february 1922 and reprinted in Light on 25 february 1922.



Editions


Spirit Life and Personality

Light (25 february 1922, p. 119)

Sir, — Many of us who have worked upon psychic subjects will welcome your report from Paris in to-day's issue in which you give Professor Charles Richet's plain statement, delivered before the French Academy of Science, to the effect that the much-derided figures of the séance-room are as a matter of fact solid, though evanescent manifestations of life. The strange substance from which they are constructed has been named 'ectoplasm' by Professor Richet himself, and has been investigated very thoroughly for a number of years by Madame Bisson, Dr. Schrenck-Notzing, Dr. Crawford, Dr. Geley, and others, who have illustrated their remarks by hundreds of photographs. I may add that I have myself both touched and seen the substance. Yet we have been treated during the last few weeks to the humiliating spectacle of certain publicists, who should be instructing their readers, pouring ridicule upon this most important modern development in psychic investigation.

Charles Richet is the most famous physiologist in the world, and as such his words should be final. But he has told us nothing which was not known fifty years ago to Professor Crookes, whose long and careful experiments, with just such a form as Professor Richet postulates, were convincing to anyone who possesses the sense of evidence and is not bemused by the idea that there is something clever in incredulity.

"Having received this high confirmation as to the existence of the actual forms, it will not be difficult for the reasoning man to go one step further and to accept — or at least to treat with respect — the assurance that we give when we say that these shapes can assume outlines which are familiar to us, and that they can show such signs of personality as to convince us of their identity. When I entered Madame Bisson's drawing-room I at once recognised the picture of her husband from having seen this ectoplasmic image in the photographs of her book. I am glad that the 'Westminster Gazette' has had the courage to give prominence to this all-important matter, but I would respectfully suggest that it has a solemn and religious bearing, and that all levity about clammy ghosts, chains, and the like is very distasteful to those who see the full human significance of these developments."






© arthur-conan-doyle.com